Green Bay Packers Tackle Rasheed Walker Arrested at LaGuardia Airport by Port Authority on Firearms Charge

Green Bay Packers offensive tackle Rasheed Walker was arrested at Queen’s LaGuardia Airport on a gun possession charge after presenting a firearm for inspection without proper credentials, according to ABC7 News. Officers responded Friday morning to a firearms check request at Terminal C, where the 25-year-old was attempting to travel with the weapon after checking in with Delta. Walker’s attorney said he voluntarily disclosed the unloaded, secured firearm upon arrival but was arrested because his Wisconsin license wasn’t valid in New York. “We are confident the matter will eventually be dismissed,” the attorney said via email. Walker has been the Packers’ first-team left tackle the past three seasons, starting 48 games since being drafted out of Penn State in 2022, and is set to become a free agent this offseason. 

Firearm possession charges in New York can carry serious legal consequences, particularly when arrests occur at major transportation hubs such as airports, where Port Authority police enforce some of the strictest gun laws in the country. Even individuals who legally own firearms in other states may face criminal charges if they lack proper New York licensing or fail to comply with state-specific transport requirements. Prosecutors often rely on airport screening procedures, firearm documentation, and licensing records to establish unlawful possession, regardless of intent or disclosure. At Petrus Law, we understand how confusing and high-stakes firearm cases in Queens can be. If you’re firearms charge, give us a call today at (646) 733-4711. 

Why Legal Representation Matters When Facing a Port Authority Firearms Charge

At Petrus Law, we understand that a Port Authority firearms charge can quickly escalate into a complex legal matter because these cases are handled by specialized law enforcement agencies and governed by some of the most restrictive firearm statutes in the country. We understand how easily lawful gun owners, particularly those traveling from other states, can find themselves facing arrest due to licensing conflicts, transportation rules, or misunderstandings at airport checkpoints. Our team focuses on analyzing the specific circumstances of the arrest, including how the firearm was declared, secured, and documented, as well as whether proper procedures were followed by authorities.

We also recognize that Port Authority cases often move quickly and involve prosecutors who aggressively pursue firearm-related offenses, even when there is no criminal intent. At Petrus Law, we work to protect our clients by scrutinizing evidence, challenging procedural errors, and identifying defenses tied to interstate travel, reciprocity issues, and statutory exceptions. We take a strategic, detail-driven approach to minimize long-term consequences and safeguard our clients’ rights, reputations, and future opportunities when they are facing serious airport-related firearm allegations.

How a Port Authority Firearms Case Is Prosecuted

A Port Authority firearms case follows a structured but aggressive prosecution path. These cases often begin at airports or transportation hubs where enforcement priorities remain extremely high. Prosecutors typically move quickly once an arrest occurs. Understanding this process helps explain why early and informed legal defense matters.

Initial Arrest and Case Intake by Port Authority Authorities

After a firearm is discovered, Port Authority police usually take immediate enforcement action. Officers secure the weapon and detain the individual without delay. The arrest process often happens before any detailed explanation is considered. This rapid response sets the tone for the prosecution.

Following the arrest, officers prepare detailed incident reports. These reports form the foundation of the case. Prosecutors rely heavily on this early documentation. Any inaccuracies can significantly affect the case trajectory.

Airport Screening and Firearm Discovery

Most Port Authority firearms cases begin during TSA screening or voluntary declaration. Firearms may be discovered in checked baggage or carry-on items. Officers document the condition, location, and accessibility of the weapon. These details often shape the initial charges.

Screening footage and checkpoint logs frequently become evidence. Prosecutors use this material to establish possession. Defense lawyers later scrutinize these records carefully. Small inconsistencies can carry major legal weight.

Seizure, Evidence Handling, and Documentation

Once discovered, the firearm is seized and logged into evidence. Officers record serial numbers, ammunition status, and storage conditions. Proper handling remains critical for admissibility. Prosecutors rely on this chain of custody.

Documentation errors may weaken the case. Missing logs or unclear records can create doubt. Defense attorneys often focus on these issues. Evidence integrity plays a central role in prosecution strategy.

Charging Decisions and Prosecutorial Strategy

Charging decisions in Port Authority cases tend to be strict. New York firearm laws provide limited discretion. Prosecutors often file charges quickly to maintain control over the case. Early charging increases pressure on defendants.

These decisions reflect policy priorities rather than individual intent. Prosecutors focus on statutory violations first. Mitigating factors may receive little early consideration. Defense advocacy becomes essential at this stage.

New York Penal Law Firearm Charges

Most cases involve criminal possession of a firearm under New York Penal Law. Charge severity depends on weapon type and circumstances. Location within an airport may elevate the seriousness. Prosecutors emphasize statutory elements.

Mandatory minimums may apply in some situations. Prosecutors often highlight public safety concerns. These arguments support aggressive prosecution. Defense counsel must counter this framing.

Treatment of Out-of-State Permits

New York does not recognize most out-of-state firearm licenses. Prosecutors often treat this issue as settled law. They rarely consider lawful ownership elsewhere as a defense. Instead, they focus on local compliance.

However, permit history still appears in charging documents. Prosecutors may use it to address intent arguments. Defense lawyers later challenge this narrow view. Licensing conflicts remain a key dispute point.

Evidence Development and Case Building

After charges are filed, prosecutors begin building their evidentiary case. They collect physical evidence, reports, and digital records. Airport surveillance often plays a central role. Each piece supports the possession allegation.

Prosecutors organize evidence to establish clear timelines. They aim to show uninterrupted possession. This approach simplifies the case narrative. Defense attorneys later disrupt this sequence.

Use of Surveillance and Airport Records

Surveillance footage frequently captures the screening process. Prosecutors rely on video to confirm discovery details. Time stamps help establish possession duration. These visuals often influence early case assessments.

Airport access logs may also appear as evidence. Prosecutors use them to confirm location and movement. Defense lawyers review these records carefully. Inconsistencies may weaken the prosecution’s claims.

Statements and Admissions by the Accused

Statements made during arrest often become evidence. Prosecutors rely on admissions about ownership or transport. Even casual remarks may appear in reports. These statements can complicate defense strategy.

Defense attorneys review how statements were obtained. They assess Miranda compliance and context. Improper questioning may lead to suppression. This review remains critical to case outcomes.

Court Proceedings and Pretrial Litigation

Once in court, prosecutors push cases forward aggressively. Early appearances focus on bail and scheduling. Judges often defer substantive arguments to later stages. Prosecutors use this time to solidify positions.

Pretrial litigation shapes the case direction. Motions and hearings determine what evidence survives. Prosecutors defend their evidence vigorously. Defense challenges often define leverage.

Arraignment and Bail Considerations

At arraignment, prosecutors formally present charges. They may argue for restrictive conditions. Public safety arguments often dominate. Judges weigh these factors carefully.

Bail decisions can affect defense preparation. Restricted travel or monitoring may apply. Prosecutors emphasize airport security concerns. Defense lawyers counter with context and history.

Pretrial Motions and Evidentiary Hearings

Prosecutors respond to defense motions with detailed filings. They defend search legality and evidence handling. These hearings test the strength of the case. Outcomes often influence plea discussions.

Evidentiary rulings shape trial strategy. Suppressed evidence weakens prosecution leverage. Prosecutors adjust tactics accordingly. Pretrial litigation often proves decisive.

Resolution Through Plea or Trial

Most Port Authority firearms cases resolve before trial. Prosecutors often offer plea agreements after motion practice. Terms depend on case strength and risk. Defense negotiations play a central role.

Some cases proceed to trial. Prosecutors then present a streamlined narrative. Defense counsel challenges possession and intent. Trial outcomes depend heavily on early procedural decisions.

Plea Negotiations and Case Resolution

Prosecutors may offer reduced charges after legal challenges. These offers reflect evidentiary risk. Defense leverage increases with successful motions. Negotiations often intensify at this stage.

Resolution may include non-criminal outcomes in limited cases. Prosecutors weigh resources and precedent. Defense advocacy remains critical. Each case requires tailored negotiation.

Trial Strategy and Burden of Proof

At trial, prosecutors must prove possession beyond a reasonable doubt. They rely on physical evidence and testimony. Airport context reinforces their narrative. Defense lawyers challenge each element.

Cross-examination exposes weaknesses in the case. Procedural errors become focal points. Jurors evaluate credibility and intent. Trial strategy reflects months of preparation.

Penalties for Bringing an Unlicensed Gun to LaGuardia Airport

Bringing an unlicensed firearm to LaGuardia Airport can result in severe criminal penalties under New York law. Enforcement at major airports remains especially strict due to public safety concerns. Even travelers with no criminal history may face serious charges. Understanding these penalties helps explain why these cases escalate quickly.

Criminal Charges for Unlicensed Firearm Possession

New York treats unlicensed firearm possession as a serious criminal offense, especially when the alleged conduct occurs inside an airport. Prosecutors often pursue either misdemeanor or felony charges depending on weapon type, ammunition presence, and surrounding circumstances. The airport setting frequently increases perceived risk and enforcement severity. As a result, penalties reflect New York’s strict firearm policies rather than individual intent.

Charges typically arise under specific New York Penal Law provisions governing criminal possession of a weapon. Prosecutors usually focus on possession itself instead of examining why the firearm was present. This approach lowers the prosecution’s burden and accelerates charging decisions. Therefore, defense strategy becomes critically important at the earliest stage.

Misdemeanor-Level Firearm Charges

Some Port Authority cases result in misdemeanor firearm charges based on statutory classifications and factual details. Relevant factors often include whether ammunition was present and whether the firearm was operable. Even first-time offenders with no criminal history may still face arrest and prosecution. These cases remain serious despite the misdemeanor label.

Penalties may include jail sentences, financial fines, and court-ordered probation. Courts often impose conditions that restrict travel or firearm possession. A criminal conviction can remain on record for years. These consequences may affect employment and future background checks.

Felony-Level Firearm Charges

Many airport firearm cases lead to felony charges, particularly when a handgun is involved without a valid New York license. Prosecutors frequently treat these cases as high priority due to public safety concerns. Felony exposure significantly increases potential penalties and long-term consequences. The risk level rises quickly once felony charges are filed.

Felony convictions may result in state prison sentences under New York law. Certain circumstances may trigger mandatory minimum penalties. A felony record can follow an individual for life. Defense efforts focus on avoiding or reducing felony exposure whenever possible.

Sentencing Exposure and Incarceration Risk

Sentencing outcomes depend heavily on the charge level and the specific facts of the case. Judges consider statutory sentencing ranges and any aggravating circumstances. The airport location often weighs heavily in sentencing discussions. Courts frequently emphasize deterrence in firearm cases.

Incarceration remains a real possibility even for first-time defendants. Short jail sentences can still disrupt employment and family stability. Defense lawyers focus on mitigation factors early. Effective advocacy may influence sentencing discretion.

Potential Jail and Prison Sentences

Misdemeanor firearm convictions can still carry jail sentences under New York law. Felony convictions may lead to state prison time with longer exposure. Sentence length varies based on statutory classification and prior history. Judges often have limited flexibility.

Incarceration can affect housing, employment, and personal relationships. Courts consider criminal history and alleged risk factors. Prosecutors frequently argue for strict punishment. Defense counsel responds with context and mitigating evidence.

Probation and Conditional Discharge

Some cases resolve with probation instead of incarceration. Probation conditions often include reporting requirements and behavioral restrictions. Violations can result in immediate penalties. Compliance remains essential throughout the probation period.

Courts may also impose conditional discharges in limited situations. These outcomes still carry strict conditions and monitoring. Failure to comply can lead to resentencing. Defense negotiation often targets these resolutions.

Additional Consequences Beyond Criminal Penalties

Penalties for firearm convictions extend far beyond courtroom sentencing. Airport firearm arrests receive heightened scrutiny from employers and agencies. Collateral consequences often create long-term challenges. Defense planning must address these broader impacts.

Travel restrictions frequently follow firearm convictions. Employment opportunities may become limited. Professional licenses may face review or denial. These effects can last well beyond the case resolution.

Permanent Criminal Record Implications

A firearm conviction typically creates a permanent criminal record. Background checks routinely reveal these offenses. Employers may deny positions based on firearm-related convictions. Housing applications may also be affected.

Record sealing options remain limited in many cases. Eligibility depends on charge level and outcome. Defense lawyers aim to prevent convictions when possible. Protecting a clean record remains a primary goal.

Firearm Rights and Future Restrictions

Firearm convictions often result in long-term or permanent possession prohibitions. Federal firearm laws may also apply. Rights restoration becomes difficult or impossible. Restrictions can last a lifetime.

Future firearm possession may trigger additional charges. Lawful travel with weapons becomes impossible. Defense strategy considers these risks carefully. Avoiding conviction helps preserve future rights.

How New York City Gun Charge Defense Lawyers Fight Back Against Port Authority Cases 

Facing a firearm arrest at a New York City airport can feel overwhelming and fast-moving. Port Authority cases often involve strict statutes, aggressive enforcement, and limited margin for error. However, experienced gun charge defense lawyers know how to push back using strategy, preparation, and deep knowledge of airport-specific enforcement. At Petrus Law, we approach these cases with a clear plan focused on protecting our clients at every stage.

Understanding the Unique Nature of Port Authority Firearms Enforcement

Port Authority firearm cases differ significantly from standard New York City gun arrests. These cases arise in high-security transportation environments governed by overlapping state and federal rules. As a result, even minor errors or misunderstandings can lead to serious criminal charges. Defense lawyers must understand how airport security, transportation law, and New York firearm statutes intersect.

Port Authority Jurisdiction and Airport Policing

Port Authority police operate under a specialized jurisdiction covering airports and transit facilities. As a result, firearm arrests often follow procedures different from typical city cases. Officers rely heavily on airport screening protocols, licensing databases, and transportation regulations. Therefore, defense lawyers must understand how these overlapping systems interact under New York law.

Additionally, airport enforcement places travelers under heightened scrutiny from the moment they enter the terminal. Firearms are frequently discovered during TSA screening or voluntary declaration. These circumstances require careful legal analysis. Understanding jurisdictional authority becomes essential to mounting an effective defense.

Arrests Involving Lawful Owners and Travelers

Many Port Authority firearm arrests involve individuals with no criminal intent. Often, cases stem from out-of-state permits or transport mistakes. Travelers may believe they complied with federal guidelines while unknowingly violating New York law. Skilled defense lawyers examine these facts closely to identify defenses early.

Moreover, lawful ownership elsewhere can influence how courts view intent. Defense attorneys use this context to challenge aggressive charging decisions. This analysis helps counter assumptions often made in airport prosecutions.

Challenging the Legality of the Stop, Search, and Arrest

An effective defense also focuses on how law enforcement discovered the firearm. Airport arrests involve searches that must still comply with constitutional standards. Even in secure areas, officers must follow proper procedures. Defense lawyers carefully review every step taken during the encounter. Errors during screening or arrest can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case. Lawyers look for violations involving scope, timing, or handling of evidence. Identifying these issues early can shift leverage back to the defense.

Reviewing Airport Screening and Search Procedures

A strong defense begins with examining how authorities discovered the firearm. Lawyers review whether officers followed required screening and seizure protocols. Any deviation from procedure may undermine the prosecution’s evidence. Therefore, attention to detail becomes critical.

Improper evidence handling can also weaken the case. Defense lawyers identify chain-of-custody issues and documentation errors. These problems may support motions to suppress key evidence. This process often changes the case trajectory.

Analyzing Probable Cause and Arrest Conduct

Defense attorneys also evaluate whether the arrest met constitutional standards. They review probable cause, officer conduct, and timing carefully. Any overreach or misstep may violate legal protections. These violations can form the basis for dismissal motions.

Additionally, lawyers assess whether statements or actions were improperly obtained. Protecting constitutional rights remains central to every defense strategy. This review strengthens the client’s position throughout the case.

Evaluating Firearm Licensing, Transport, and Disclosure Issues

Licensing and transport details often determine how Port Authority firearm cases proceed. New York firearm laws impose strict requirements that differ sharply from other states. Even well-intentioned travelers may unknowingly violate these rules. Defense lawyers analyze these factors thoroughly to frame the case accurately. Disclosure behavior also plays a critical role in these prosecutions. How and when a firearm is declared can affect charging decisions. Experienced attorneys use these details to advocate for fair treatment.

Out-of-State Permits and Licensing Conflicts

Port Authority cases frequently involve confusion over firearm license reciprocity. New York does not recognize most out-of-state permits. However, lawful ownership elsewhere still matters when evaluating circumstances. Defense lawyers document licensing history carefully to present mitigating factors. Understanding these conflicts allows attorneys to argue lack of criminal intent. Prosecutors often overlook these nuances. A thorough licensing analysis helps rebalance the narrative.

Voluntary Disclosure and Proper Transport Arguments

Voluntary disclosure plays a significant role in airport firearm cases. Travelers who declare firearms often face different legal considerations. Defense lawyers highlight these actions to show cooperation and responsibility. This approach may support reduced charges or dismissal. Transport details also matter greatly. Lawyers examine whether firearms were unloaded, locked, and stored correctly. These facts can significantly affect legal outcomes. Careful documentation strengthens defense arguments.

Leveraging Statutory Exceptions and Case Law

Statutory language and prior court decisions often provide powerful defense tools. New York firearm statutes include narrow provisions that can apply in airport cases. Defense lawyers must recognize when these exceptions apply. Proper interpretation requires experience and precision. Case law further shapes how judges view Port Authority arrests. Courts rely on precedent to assess intent and legality. Defense attorneys use these decisions strategically to strengthen their arguments.

Applying New York Firearm Statutory Exceptions

New York firearm laws include narrow statutory exceptions. Experienced defense lawyers know how to identify and apply them correctly. These exceptions may involve locked containers or specific travel conditions. When applicable, they weaken the prosecution’s theory. Using statutory language precisely matters in court. Defense attorneys tailor arguments to match these provisions. This precision often creates leverage during negotiations.

Using Prior Court Decisions Strategically

Case law shapes how courts interpret airport firearm arrests. Defense lawyers rely on prior rulings to support motions and arguments. These decisions guide judges when evaluating similar facts. Strategic citation strengthens the defense position. Additionally, precedent helps counter overly broad interpretations by prosecutors. Lawyers use past rulings to narrow charges. This legal foundation often proves decisive.

Negotiating with Prosecutors and Protecting Long-Term Consequences

Defense efforts do not stop with legal motions. Negotiation plays a major role in Port Authority firearm cases. Prosecutors often begin with aggressive positions. Experienced defense lawyers know how to push back effectively. Long-term consequences also remain a central concern. Firearm charges can affect employment, travel, and professional standing. Defense strategies must account for these lasting impacts.

Early Engagement and Charge Reduction Strategies

Port Authority prosecutors often pursue firearm charges aggressively at first. However, skilled defense lawyers engage early to shape discussions. They present mitigating facts and legal issues clearly and persuasively. As a result, prosecutors may reconsider initial positions. Early negotiation can reduce exposure significantly. Defense attorneys aim to resolve issues before escalation. This strategy protects clients from unnecessary risk.

Focusing on Long-Term Impact and Client Futures

Firearm charges carry consequences beyond immediate penalties. Convictions can affect employment, travel, and licensing. Defense lawyers consider these long-term effects throughout the case. Every decision reflects future impact. Protecting a client’s record remains a top priority. Attorneys pursue outcomes that preserve opportunities and stability. This forward-looking approach defines effective Port Authority firearm defense.

Contact an Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Skilled in Firearms Cases 

At Petrus Law, we bring focused experience and a deep understanding of New York firearm laws to cases involving airport arrests and complex jurisdictional issues. We know how intimidating it can be to face criminal charges tied to firearm possession, especially when Port Authority police and prosecutors are involved. Our team takes the time to understand every detail of the situation, from how the firearm was transported and disclosed to how the arrest was handled, so we can build a defense strategy tailored to the facts of the case. We also recognize that firearm charges can carry consequences far beyond the courtroom, impacting a person’s employment opportunities, professional licensing, ability to travel, and overall personal reputation. 

An arrest alone can create long-term stress and uncertainty, especially when the charge arises from a misunderstanding of New York’s strict firearm laws rather than criminal intent. At Petrus Law, we work proactively at every stage of the legal process, carefully evaluating evidence, identifying weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, and pursuing strategic options such as dismissals, charge reductions, or alternative resolutions when available. We understand how high the stakes can be and approach every firearms case with the goal of protecting our clients’ futures, not just resolving the immediate charge. If you or a loved one is facing a firearms-related charge, call us at (646) 733-4711 or fill out our online form today to discuss your case and learn how we can help protect your rights.